![]() Taking a look at it, yes, I can see really small pixels. From the standpoint of someone who doesn't care about the resolution being super-high (as I like to play games on my Macbook and having to push that many pixels at once would make many of my games unplayable despite how well the MBA handles them), you don't really notice it much. Many people expect the next Macbook Air to have retina. If you're really dependent on a higher resolution screen then I'd say you want retina. Just because 11" is on a lesser resolution doesn't mean the screen is terrible. I bet you will be surprised of how many "heavy" channels can it handle.Įxcept, it's proportional. But if you plan to produce music or sound design, edit audio and all that stuff, you can easily go with a MBA.īut if you are still doubting, if you can try some friend's MBA (a 2013 or a 2014 would be fine) with Logic Pro X or any other DAW, just create a MIDI channel with a synth playing, put vst's (or the native effects of the DAW) in each channel (reverb, EQ's, compressors, delays, filters, saturators.) and duplicate the track until the MBA can't handle it and the sound starts popping and crackling. If you are seriously concerned about how can it scale (giantic projects and high demandings) then wait and go for a 15" rMBP. But almost nobody works at 192KHz (only professionals), even most producers or audio editors do it at 44,5KHz (or 96KHz) so it will be fine. Obviously if you're going to work at 192KHz and 24 bits with multiple channels crowded of VST's and VSTi's it won't do. I can run it quite smoothly in my MBP 2010 (with a Core 2 Duo, which is almost 3 times less powerful than the i5 of the actual Air). TOTALLY FALSE that you can't run Logic Pro X on an Air. Lol, absolutely impossible? don't trust those funny resellers as they want you to spend as much as possible.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |